Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 41 - 60
of 709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
For the majority, Lord Wilson gave the main judgment. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 10:23 am
Me.) in Baines v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:10 am
Supreme Court G Hamilton (Tullochgribban Mains) Ltd v The Highland Council & Anor[2012] UKSC 31 (11 July 2012) ANS & Anor v ML [2012] UKSC 30 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) BA, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 1529 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Keay & Anor v Morris Homes (West Midlands) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 900 (11 July 2012) Holmes & Anor v Evans & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 941 (11 July 2012) BA & Ors… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Hodge and Lord Sales gave the main judgment with which Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Leggatt agreed. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
They lost on their main challenge to the compatibility of the rules with the HRA and judicial review principles, the court holding that in general it is the decision in an individual case which may be incompatible with ECHR rights, rather than the relevant general rules or policies (para. 57). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:52 am
It is clear why challengers saw Democrat Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows as the most likely to endorse their theory. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Here I consider only the main arguments concerning “parole” of undocumented migrants and control of the southern border generally. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
The secretary of state clearly is an officer. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Tribal rights, water rights, states’ rights and the Colorado River: What’s at stake in the SCOTUS case, Arizona v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 11:58 am
In Block Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
The case of Patmainiece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was reported in an earlier post. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am
The media has commented on the escalating tension with China with the BBC highlighting Chinese state media criticising comments made by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (o.t.a) v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:59 pm
The Main Street borrower must have “significant” operations in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:34 am
United States 24-571Issues: (1) Whether, under Honeycutt v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
