Search for: "Major J. Brown"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
Also of note, the majority (77.1%) of these federal illegal reentry defendants did have to deal with the impact of a prior criminal history in sentencing under the USSG Sentencing Tables. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:55 am
Even liberal justice Ketanji Onyika Brown Jackson called the effort anti-democratic. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
For example, Justice Kagan pointed out that if Congress can lift the disability by a 2/3 majority, "then surely it can't be right that one House of Congress can do the exact same thing by a simple majority. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
Figures like federal court Judge J. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
Newsom sending state attorneys to help prosecute crimes in Alameda County appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
During a six-week span, Brown received a Senate salary that had been increased during the time he had been elected to the House. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 738 (1974) (as applied to candidates for President and Congress); Jenness v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 738 (1974) (as applied to candidates for President and Congress); Jenness v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:24 am
The ordinance will require a majority vote then a second vote by the full City Council before it can be adopted. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
[Justice Scalia erred because there are no “Officers of the United States” appointed outside Article II, Section II.] [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Natural Defense Resource Council,[1] an outcome that would signal a major change to the administrative state. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Early in 2021, overwhelming majorities of both the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
In an article for the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Christopher J. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 11:00 pm
In the case of Brown v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
When Morgan J. found them unconstitutional, the government reenacted the legislation with the inclusion of section 33 of the Charter. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
The question is: are we talking about agreements that all or the vast majority of the members of our legal community seem to have about the law (i.e., we all think that any reading about the law must be able to recognize the value of a decision like Brown); or are we referring, instead, to individual legal criteria, about which we are personally persuaded (i.e., because we are individually convinced about the value of the theory of delibe [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Immediately after Justice Antonin Scalia passed away in 2016, the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, refused to hold confirmation hearings for any successor chosen by Mr. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court, Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:45 am
Matthew J. [read post]
