Search for: "Marc v. Traveler" Results 41 - 60 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Trump’s travel ban,” has triggered criticism. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Alex Potcovaru
In travel ban news, on Monday the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit announced its ruling upholding most of the injunction in Hawaii v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:21 am by Matthew Kahn
Quinta Jurecic posted the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Trump that could risk Trump admitting his true intentions of the travel ban in post-ruling tweets. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari in Carpenter v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am by Josh Blackman
Since January 2017, over two dozen judges have heard oral arguments concerning the legality of President Trump’s travel bans. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Isaac Park analyzed the Supreme Court’s ruling in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
TTAB Renders Split Decision in MONSTER v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 12:57 pm by Giles Peaker
R (VC) v North Somerset Council (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) CO/3801/2015 This claim concerned a challenge brought by an Irish Traveller to a “local connection” requirement contained within North Somerset Council’s housing allocations scheme, which had been extended beyond Part VI Housing Act 1996 allocations to cover Gypsy/Traveller site allocations. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The LSE Media Policy Project Blog argues that this news may be good news for travellers with mobile phones, but argues that pressing issues remain on the future of net neutrality in Europe. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]