Search for: "Mark Anton"
Results 41 - 60
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2020-2021 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:27 am
The pledge is lead by illustrious IP notables, including Diane Peters (Creative Commons) and Mark Lemley (Stanford), but it excludes trade marks and trade secrets. [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:32 am
As the Texas Tornado, Mark Bennett, sarcastically twitted, this is an “Important question when reading the Bill of Things We Deserve. [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:54 pm
Human Rights in Global Health: Rights-Based Governance for a Globalizing World/li>Mark A. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
” If the Supreme Court agree with the Appellants, that would be a marked shift in the operation of the section 4 public interest defence, potentially enabling major publishers to justify avoiding pre-publication enquiries. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:36 am
What about copyright and trade marks? [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:31 am
Best book on Trade Mark LawThe nominations were:Digital Brand Protection: Investigating Brand Piracy & Intellectual Property Abuse, by Steven UstelLikelihood of Confusion in Trade Mark Law: A Practical Guide to the Case Law of EU Courts, by Jeroen Muyldermans, Paul MaeyaertThe Confusion Test European Trade Mark Law, by Dev Gangjee and Ilhana Fhima The winner is: The Confusion Test European Trade Mark Law, by Dev Gangjee and Ilhana Fhima ! [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Below the fold are the results of the 2019-2020 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:34 am
Allen was represented by Gary Udashen and Bruce Anton of the Innocence Project of Texas. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Simmons & Anton Strezhnev, Human Rights and Human Welfare: Looking for a ‘Dark Side’ to International Human Rights Law, (In: The Future of Human Rights 60-87 (Jack Snyder et al. eds., Cambridge University Press, 2018).Stijn Smet, Free Speech versus Religious Feelings, the Sequel: Defamation of the Prophet Muhammad in E.S. v Austria, (European Constitutional Law Review, Forthcoming).From SmartCILP;Theresa Finley & Mark Koyama, Plague, Politics, and… [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:19 am
Kaes, Anton, Martin Jay, and Edward Dimendberg, eds. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:02 am
” The post Celebrity Millennium Suicide by Crew Member Marks Sad End to Final Voyage appeared first on . [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Mark Sveen and respondent Kaye Melin were married in 1997. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Asay cdasay BYU Christy Hurt ach_ BYU Gordon Smith professor_smith BYU Ari Ezra Waldman ariezrawaldman Cal Western James Coleman energylawprf Calgary Jassmine Girgis JassmineGirgis Calgary Corporate restructuring Corporate law Contracts Lorian Hardcastle Lorian_H Calgary Health law Ian Holloway LawDeanHolloway Calgary Fenner Stewart fennerstewart Calgary … [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
[We have the following announcement.]Jhering Global: International Symposium on the occasion of Rudolf von Jhering’s 200th birthdayOn 6 and 7 September 2018, the international symposium Jhering Global will be held in Hanover (Germany), marking the 200th anniversary of Rudolf von Jhering’s birth in 1818. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
. ___ (Decided June 11, 2018)Mark Sveen purchased a life insurance policy, naming his then spouse, Kaye Melin, as the primary beneficiary and designating his two children from a prior marriage, Ashley and Antone Sveen, as contingent beneficiaries. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:59 am
” The ruling came in the case of Ashley and Antone Sveen, whose father Mark married Kaye Melin in 1997. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:36 am
Mark Perry, on behalf of Lucia, opened by stating that SEC ALJs are officers under all the Court's precedents. [read post]
