Search for: "Mark C. Gildea"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
(for now) – District Court C D California judgement in Carter Bryant v Mattel (Property, intangible) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Golden – Plaintiff need not attach copyright registration to complaint: Golden v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Medinol Limited (EPLAW) EWHC (Pat): Costs order knocks spots off pimple patent: Select Healthcare v Cromptons (PatLit) EWPCC: ‘User’ basis available for assessment of trade mark damages: National Guild of Removers & Storers Ltd v Silveria (t/a C S Movers) (IP finance) Do it by the book: case management and questions for reference: Westwood v Knight; SAS Institute v World Programming (IPKat) EWCA finds Grimme’s agricultural machinery patent inventive, clarifies… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
”: Case C? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
HemCon, Inc (Patents Post-Grant) (Patently-O) (Reexamination Alert) (IPBiz) CAFC: Construing claim constructions: Cordis Corporation v Boston Scientific (Patently-O) (IPBiz) Kimberly-Clark: CAFC loses an opportunity to address law of preliminary injunctions: Kimberly Clark v First Quality Baby Products (IPBiz) The Federal Circuit’s rare opportunity to protect the public from agency misconduct: In re Jeff Lovin (Patently-O) District Court C D California: Another false marking… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court Columbia: Record breaking… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am
The Copyright police are coming (TorrentFreak) US Trademarks & Domain Names District Court N D Illinois: Google is the senior user of ANDROID mark: Specht v Google (Property, intangible) [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:24 pm
Bermann, Petros C. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Greenberg, Kathy Greene, Stephen Grein, Mark A. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 pm
Wolf (EFF) Righthaven – Righthaven, still angering judges, finally pays cash for its mistakes (ArsTechnica) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions TTAB affirms genericness refusal of CONSUMERAFFAIRS.COM for … Guess what? [read post]
