Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 41 - 60 of 5,916
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Martin Wells set out to do a meta-analysis, which was all fine and good. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:06 pm by Marcel Pemsel
This is a rather vague concept but seems to be akin to the requirement of ‘significant departure from the standard and customs in the relevant sector’ applied to three-dimensional trade marks representing (parts of) the goods (e.g. case C-417/16 P at para. 35). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
Trump’s Alleged Violations of the Gag Order DANY’s initial April 15 request for an order to show cause—effectively a motion to find Trump in contempt of court—argues that there is “good cause” for believing that three social media postings by Trump (numbers 1-3 below) violate the gag order. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
As we gather to mark ten years of dialogue, I think it’s important to both summarize what we’ve learned during this period and see how we can leverage those lessons to effect better compliance in the future. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Robert Costello—Costello is “Lawyer C” in the statement of facts. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriends Jakob Plesner Mathiasen and Matilde Helene Bom (both Gorrissen Federspiel) on a recent Danish decision tackling the relationship between trade mark law and freedom of expression. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The two decisions mark the second and third times a federal district court has held that a Federal Reserve Bank has the discretion to deny master accounts to legally eligible depository institutions. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm by David Oscar Markus
Circuit, offers as good a definition of judicial collegiality as I have seen. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the risk of the petitioner repeating the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by, or under the influence of, alcohol or controlled substances or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance or repeating any other offense listed in section 303(1)(d), (e), or (f) or (2)(c), (d), (e), or (f) of the act is a low or minimal risk. iv. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods/services. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Corn’s article Should the Best Offense Ever Be a Good Defense? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:44 am
The Board found the mark to be too dissimilar to the KATE SPADE word mark and the "spade logo" mark to support Kate Spade's Section 2(d) likelihood-of-confusion and Section 43(c) dilution-by-blurring claims. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn, “False-Positive Psychology: UndisclosedFlexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant,” 22 Psychological Sci. 1359 (2011). [4] C. [read post]
 However, he went on to explain that the decision is perhaps less surprising when it is borne in mind that the judge had found on the evidence that: (a) the Wordless Mark had become distinctive of Lidl through use of the Word with Text; (b) that the Tesco Signs would call the Mark with Text to mind, and (c) and that it is common ground that Lidl have a reputation for low prices. [read post]