Search for: "Mark C. Johnson" Results 41 - 60 of 709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 7:23 am by Michael Oykhman
Section 129 of the Criminal Code states that everyone who: (a) resists or wilfully obstructs a public officer or peace officer in the execution of his duty or any person lawfully acting in aid of such an officer, (b) omits, without reasonable excuse, to assist a public officer or peace officer in the execution of his duty in arresting a person or in preserving the peace, after having reasonable notice that he is required to do so, or (c) resists or wilfully obstructs any person in the… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm by Holman
On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed, explaining: We are bound by our precedent in C R Bard Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm by Kalvis Golde
§ 1052(c) violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Zeldin and Santos congressional campaigns had one more thing in common: they shared a treasurer, Nancy Marks. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, I have for some years now been engaged in a friendly dispute with yet another close friend, Mark Graber, about the nomenclature of 1776 and its aftermath. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Bankman-Fried’s spending helped support CLC Action, a 501(c)(4), as well as the ethics watchdog’s tax-exempt charitable arm. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:04 am by Jim Sedor
FTX Founder Bankman-Fried’s Campaign Finance Charges ‘Just the Tip of the Iceberg’ MSN – Julia Manchester (The Hill) | Published: 12/13/2022 FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was charged with violating a slew of campaign finance laws, marking another major blow for the former cryptocurrency leader. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
"[C]ourts should not 'uphold every modern law that remotely resembles a historical analogue,' because doing so 'risk[s] endorsing outliers that our ancestors would never have accepted.'" Id. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 7 November 2022, judgment was handed down in the case of AB v Chief Constable of British Transport Police [2022] EWHC 2749 (KB) by Mr Justice Johnson. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
[Professors Miller and Tucker miss the mark, while Saul Cornell disdains accuracy] An article by Duke law professor Darrell A.H. [read post]