Search for: "Mark Chappell"
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
As a result, these expert recommendations are unfortunately missing their mark. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:38 am
The Government retained this evidence throughout the prosecution of this matter. . . .During the course of trial, counsel for co-Defendants Chappell Dew and Mark Manuel argued that they attempted to review the contents of the hard drive and were unsuccessful. . . . [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:01 am
I'm sure Mark Bennett isn't looking for a calendar to count when those TEN DAYS SIR start, but while we all wait for the failure of a lawsuit that will do nothing but again bring Matthew Chappell's stupid scheme to the forefront of his young legal career, I also have some advice.Matthew, your proposal is unethical and possibly criminal. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:17 am
So Chappell hit the streets looking for a willing mark. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
In 1988 Warner/Chappell purchased Summy Co. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:42 am
Thierry Calame (Lenz & Staehelin), the Committee's Co-Chair, lead the panel session with an expert panel including Judge Meier-Beck (Presiding Judge of the German Federal Court of Justice), Larry Welch (Eli Lilly), Tina Chappell (Intel) and Michael Frohlich. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:25 pm
The Opening Ceremony marks the official kick-off of the Congress. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., No. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
King in the Central District of California has just established that Warner-Chappell do not hold any valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics, Merpel recounts.* The "Happy Birthday" saga: when it may have been better not to have sued? [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:28 am
Yes, that last paragraph was pretty nerdly, and I almost put it in an inset paragraph marked FOR LEGAL NERDS ONLY. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:53 am
The rights to the song were bought for $15 million in 1988 by music publisher Warner/Chappell Music Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:20 am
The Ninth Circuit has now reversed the lower court’s dismissal of the Foundation claim, ruling that the foundation had standing since it receives royalties from the copyrights held by Warner/Chappell Music and so had standing as a “real party in interest” ruling “It is undisputed that copyright ownership lies with Warner/Chappell, but just as the termination notices affect Warner/Chappell’s ownership of copyrights, they… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
Sunstein, Noah Feldman, and The Editors, all at Bloomberg View, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern, both at Slate, Zack Ford and Judd Legum, as well as Ian Millhiser, at Think Progress, Ryan T. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm
Commentary comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, German Lopez at Vox, and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
Reilly and Jennifer Bendery at Huffington Post, David Kurtz at Talking Points Memo, Josh Gerstein at Politico, Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST, and Bill Chappell at NPR. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
* Win for Winfrey, as trade mark soap-Oprah powers downMarie-Andrée is back to report on the Southern District of New York’s decision regarding Oprah Winfrey’s motion to dismiss the trade mark infringement suit filed against her use of the “Own Your Power” slogan.* EPO crisis: what actually happened at the December Administrative Council meeting? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
It is about a business that got a bunch of trade marks covering the somewhat unregistrable word "supreme", and then decided to bring proceedings against a defendant who wasn't using the word as a trade mark and whose use of it went back 20 years, recounts Jeremy.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO v EPO [on which see… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
But how about trade marks, wonders Eleonora? [read post]
