Search for: "Mark D. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 1,552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  In any realistic sense, the lab tech or officer is testifying by marking down the notes. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:47 am
In re Peter Wood, Geoffrey Dean-Smith, and Tasha Mudd, Serial No. 87022288 (October 25, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 8:16 am
Campaign Contributions and Expense Reports show that incumbents start their races with the cash on hand as follows: Nevada Supreme Court: Seat D - Mark Gibbons - $58,099 Clark County District Court Judges District Court Dept. 3 - Douglas Herndon - $160,167 (last report filed1/12/07) District Court Dept. 8 - Doug Smith (funds may be available from his justice court campaigns, amount unknown) District Court Dept. 10 - Jessie Walsh - $0 (end of 2002 report) District… [read post]
20 May 2015, 10:23 am by Debra A. McCurdy
The Reed Smith Health Industry Washington Watch blog has been updated to report on recent health policy developments, including the following: Regulatory Developments. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 10:58 am by D. Kappos
Smith, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences September 16, 2012 marks a momentous occasion for the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 2:51 pm
Recent LexBlog Q & A posts: Mark Obbie, professor at Syracuse University's S.I. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:13 am by Lawrence Solum
Lionel Bently is the Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law at the University of Cambridge. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 3:45 am
"] October 26, 2021 - 1 PM: In re James Todd Smith, Serial No. 88595239 [Refusal to register THE INFLUENCE OF HIP HOP for "Radio communications; radio broadcasting information; mobile radio communication" because "the specimen of use does not show use of the mark in connection with the services identified in the application.] [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:08 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
The Trademark Examining Attorney refused registration of Applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
 At first instance,covered by the IPKat here, Peter Smith J (English judges usually only get a surname – unless there is another judge around with the same one, like, in this case, Sir Andrew Smith) dismissed almost all of Mattel’s claims: there was no infringement of Mattel's two SCRABBLE marks (and no passing off) by the use of SCRAMBLE or SCRAMBLE WITH FRIENDS. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:04 am
In re Sherrilyn Kenyon, Serial No. 85396538 (July 9, 2014) [not precedential].The fact that the involved marks are identical weighed heavily against applicant in the Section 2(d) analysis. [read post]