Search for: "Mark Daniels"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
” The Jack Daniel’s marks and trade dress would certainly seem to qualify as “famous” marks (being “widely recognized” by the public). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
On appeal, the Supreme Court said that the issue was not whether a dog toy is an expressive work but rather the nature of the use of Jack Daniel’s marks. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
” All members of the court joined Kagan’s opinion finding that toy a condemnable infringement of the Jack Daniel’s marks. [read post]
ONE OF THOSE MOMENTS: Mark Steyn on “Obama’s lazy tribute to Daniel Pearl:” Like a lot of guys who’…
21 May 2010, 11:01 pm
ONE OF THOSE MOMENTS: Mark Steyn on “Obama’s lazy tribute to Daniel Pearl:” Like a lot of guys who’ve been told they’re brilliant one time too often, President Obama gets a little lazy, and doesn’t always choose his words with care. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Justice Samuel Alito, for example, seemed completely unpersuaded that Jack Daniel’s faces any real-world risk of confusion, as he asked repeatedly whether “any reasonable person [could] think that Jack Daniel’s had approved this use of the mark. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Daniel’s argues that the Ninth Circuit’s ruling places a potential infringer’s free-speech rights above those of a trademark holder, and that this protection will give “copycats free license to prey on unsuspecting consumers and mark holders. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Daniel’s argues that the Ninth Circuit’s ruling places a potential infringer’s free-speech rights above those of a trademark holder, and that this protection will give “copycats free license to prey on unsuspecting consumers and mark holders. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
It is a mark of democracy that this debate is taking place and that its touchstones are law and values rather than simply the effectiveness of the means used to secure the policy goals. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
The Illinois result marks the first time in the investigation that Salmonella was found in an unopened package of Daniele salami. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:49 pm
Alumnus Mark Cohen, who was recently honored by the Colorado State Bar Association for his six years of service on the Editorial Board of The Colorado Lawyer magazine from July 2009 through June 2015, including service as Board Chair from 2012-2013.Since completing the program, Mark has returned to practice in Colorado where he focuses on agricultural law issues, mediation and arbitration, with a specialization in assisting businesses and other lawyers improve their documents… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:55 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, in a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Ranking Member Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) Executive Director Daniel Ravicher expressed "deep concern" over the Committee's addition of a provision to the Senate patent reform bill (S. 515) that would eliminate qui tam false patent marking suits. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
No. 22-148 (Aug. 5, 2022). [3] Id. [4] The Rogers test states that expressive works may use another’s trademark unless (i) the mark has no artistic relevance to the underlying work; or (ii) use of the mark is explicitly misleading. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
No. 22-148 (Aug. 5, 2022). [3] Id. [4] The Rogers test states that expressive works may use another’s trademark unless (i) the mark has no artistic relevance to the underlying work; or (ii) use of the mark is explicitly misleading. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm
A quote:Before Daniels chose Mark Massa to fill the last Supreme Court... [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:01 pm
Danielle Shelton Drake Law School is pleased to announce that Professor Danielle Shelton has been elected a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation (ABF). [read post]
RICHARD S. PHILLIPS AND THE PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, P.A. v. DANIEL COX AND COX LAW CENTER, L.L.C., et al.
25 Nov 2018, 5:02 pm
Civil litigation — Discovery failure — Attorney’s fees In this case, the Circuit Court for Talbot County granted appellee Mark Wester’s motion to compel discovery, and entered judgment in the amount of $980.50 in favor of his attorneys, appellees Daniel Cox and the Cox Law Center, LLC (“Cox”), and against Jessica Wester’s attorneys, appellants Richard ... [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:19 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:10 am
IP at the Supreme Court Series: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 1:45 pm
" This is the mark of a transplant, who needs to overcompensate for his lack of nativity. [read post]
