Search for: "Mark Fish v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:00 am by Rachel Taylon
 However, the court warned the litigants that this was not to be a “fishing expedition,” and the grounds on which Cuban relied in his Motion should be the presumptive limits of discovery. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:59 am
 Case C 147/14 Loutfi Management Propriété intellectuelle SARL v AMJ Meatproducts NV, Halalsupply NV is a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling last Thursday in a Community trade mark-related reference from Belgium. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider the scope of tribal fishing rights. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ken White
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:34 am by The Federalist Society
Yates was given fair notice that throwing undersized fish into the Gulf of Mexico would violate the "document shredding provision" of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am by NARF
Washington (Aboriginal Title; Off-Reservation Fishing Rights) Rabang v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Balancing the fishes’ scales: Tribal, State, and Federal interests in fishing rights and water quality in Maine. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
  My infatuation began with Judge Evans' opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
Silynx is reportedly seeking a federal trademark for its QUIETOPS mark Nacre is represented by Andrew Kopsidas of DC's Fish & Richardson (with Gregory A. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
  (j) Fishing rights shall be deemed to be situated in the country in whose government's jurisdiction such rights are exercisable. [read post]