Search for: "Mark Hope v. State of Indiana" Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
I hope other defendants get as lucky. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
”  Golonka, 65 P.3d at 971-72 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  In a hopeful development, after Conte was decided, the California Supreme Court, in an asbestos case, rejected the sort of foreseeability uber alles rationale on which Contewas based:An interpretation of [the law] that would require a manufacturer to war [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  Some states qualify their safe harbors with modifying adverbs, such as "specifically," "expressly," or "affirmatively" (Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:13 am by SHG
  Via the Texas Tornado, Mark Bennett, Indiana has "undone" the ruling of its Supreme Court in Barnes v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Would it be too much to hope for an amendment? [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 11:56 am
Kentucky Revised Statute 1.200(1) provides: The boundary with Indiana begins at the point on the Ohio River common to the boundary lines for the States of Ohio, Indiana, and the Commonwealth of Kentucky, thence southwesterly, along the boundary line common to the States of Indiana and Kentucky, the boundary line being a series of straight lines between sequentially numbered geodetic points, 1927 North American Datum, as fixed by the Supreme Court of the… [read post]