Search for: "Mark P. v. Jennifer P."
Results 41 - 60
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Jennifer L. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Whether a court engages with copyright limitations in the decision appears to make a big difference about who wins the case. 60% invoke some limitation; P wins 2/3 of the time when court doesn’t mention limitations; D wins 2/3 of the time when court does do so. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
., Albany(Jennifer C. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
., Albany(Jennifer C. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:27 am
Rptr. 476, 561 P.2d 1164].) [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
October 31, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Jennifer A. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
Arguing Counsel Stephen P. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
Oracle, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Jennifer Davis: maybe no empirical evidence is ever probative—different approaches include psychologists, polling, neurologists, linguists. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico also provides coverage. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
McGregor (Indiana-Indianapolis), Mark E. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Other commentators have provided an excellent summary of the Federal Circuit’s opinion, see, e.g., Rebecca Tushnet, Jennifer Rothman, and John Welch, so this blog post will focus on the implications of the decision rather than provide a detailed summary of it. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
[Professors Miller and Tucker miss the mark, while Saul Cornell disdains accuracy] An article by Duke law professor Darrell A.H. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Perhaps we have reached the stage of dealing with scientific evidence at which errant and aberrant cases should be retracted, and clearly marked as retracted in the official reporters, and in the electronic legal databases. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
See Jennifer Senior, InConversation: Antonin Scalia, New York Magazine, Oct. 4, 2013. [read post]
