Search for: "Mark S Rogers"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:50 am
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 155: Mark Swartz on the Harm Caused by Canada’s Copyright Term Extension 9. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
Mark Lisheron, A Killer's Conscience, Austin American-Statesman (Dec. 9, 2001). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
Following the Jack Daniel’s decision, to resolve whether the Rogers test applies, the Second Circuit had to determine if MSCHF used Vans’ marks as a mark for its own goods. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:26 pm
Takeaway: As courts begin to apply the Supreme Court’s relatively strict interpretation of Rogers and when First Amendment protections apply to use of third-party marks, courts will likely reserve Rogers application to use of third-party marks as titles in expressive works like films and books. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Betteridge’s Law of Headlines states: “Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Meanwhile, Senate sponsors of the CCCA, namely Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, and Roger Marshall, a Republican from Kansas, have kept up their crusade to pass the CCCA bill, if not this year, at least in this congressional session, which wraps up at the end of 2024. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:45 am
Defacing a Firearm As defined in C.R.S. 18-12-104, defacing a firearm involves altering or removing the firearm’s serial number or other identifying mark. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
To reject Erie is to recognize, as Francis Bacon put it, and as Justice Scalia noted in Rogers v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:04 pm
” Roger Marshall (R-KS) told the group that 100 Americans die every day from AMR. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
I’m going to talk briefly about last term’s Jack Daniels case—a trademark infringement and dilution case—as well as Elster, argued last week, in which the Justices appeared inclined to reject a First Amendment challenge to the refusal to register the claimed mark “TRUMP TOO SMALL” for t-shirts. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
But, caveat, compare Booking.com where the Court seems to think that TM has no normative components, it’s all empirical about what is functioning as a mark: the limit case is when TM owners convince 15% of consumers that any reference to them at all requires permission and so there’s at least a 43(a) violation in any unauthorized reference—the Court seemed unwilling to deal with that scenario, which fits the facts of a number of the Rogers cases… [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
Sir Roger Singleton – Roger was formerly chief executive of Barnardo’s and a Government adviser on safeguarding, He was author of the scrutiny report into the Church’s original Past Cases Review and was the interim Director of Safeguarding for the Church pending a permanent appointment. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 4:15 am
Here’s today’s news. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
John Rogers says he is ready to fight the charges and seek another term in the Alabama Legislature. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 1:37 am
It’s that easy. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
Today marks the release of a white paper I have been working on for a long time, titled “Knowledge and Decisions in the Information Age: The Law & Economics of Regulating Misinformation on Social-Media Platforms. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:12 am
Rogers, Gerard F. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
Ownership and Validity of BAYC Marks: The Court affirmed Yuga’s ownership and protectable rights over the BAYC Marks, despite their unregistered status. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
McDonald and Roger A. [read post]
