Search for: "Mark T. Morris" Results 41 - 60 of 524
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by Unknown
Not long after I had written Monday’s commentary, A Tax Proposal That Misses the Mark, but before it published, reader Morris shared with me his discovery of the very same proposal. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 8:00 pm by AccelerateEditor
Physical evidence, like skid marks, vehicle positioning, and on-site debris, is ephemeral and can be quickly lost or altered. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
Stephen Jones, and Alan's daughter, Hilary, kindly shared a short obituary with IPKat readers.Rose Hughes analysed the recent decision in Philip Morris v BAT [2023] EWHC 2616 (Pat), which dealt with the standard for invalidity due to added matter. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:47 am
I.e., won't the consumer nearly always be "drawn to the products by viewing the prominent word mark, logos and the decorative colors? [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
If a taxpayer makes a computational error, doesn’t realize that a deduction claimed last year isn’t available this year, is unaware of a newly enacted credit limitation, or mis-identifies a window as qualifying for an energy credit, the taxpayer is not committing tax fraud. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:46 pm
In the comments, OSweet, noting Morris's "Whether or not I get paid... [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 10:06 am
I can't say whether German teachers are softer on it, but I certainly don't think that those marking final university exams or theses/dissertations, or publishers, are any less offended by it than we are. [read post]
The mark was granted protection in some jurisdictions but failed in the EU, where it was opposed by the tobacco giant Philip Morris Brands (PMB), the owner of Marlboro, on the grounds of likelihood of confusion and reputation in the Marlboro rooftop mark for cigarettes. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:33 am
Because of the Memorial Day holiday this weekend, today's post marks our last full update until Tuesday. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:28 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 78  [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs |  Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP.Never too late 77 [week ending on Sunday 20 December] – GC on… [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 2:54 pm
Philip Morris Inc. (1976), 27 C.P.R. (2d) 205 and Thomas J. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Unknown
It’s not just the journalists who don’t get it right. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 7:23 am
”Why shouldn't I presume that the agency would get the best deal it could for all of its clients? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
Morris National, Inc, Cancellation No. 92052158 [Petition to cancel a registration for the mark NUTFFLES for "chocolate and candy," on the ground of likely confusion with the registered mark P-NUTTLES, in standard character and design form, for "nut candies"].April 24, 2013 - 2 PM: Edgecraft Corportion v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
But I’m not sure that courts will ultimately see this my way; so far they haven’t been inclined to do so, precisely because the exclusion of a mark from federal registration leaves people entirely free to use the mark. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 3:40 pm by Trey Mills
I never did either but saw an opportunity to make a buck (sound familiar Philip Morris?) [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:30 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Mark Zuckerberg didn't come up with the idea for an online social network, register the domain Facebook.com and collect a few billion dollars. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 10:07 am
Philip Morris was also "condamnée aux dépens", which presumably didn't bankrupt them because their next step was to appeal to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). [read post]