Search for: "Mark W Condit"
Results 41 - 60
of 915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 3:41 am
Pear Therapeutics, Inc., Cancellation No. 92073785 (June 17, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:10 am
In re Ruta Maya Royalty, Ltd, Serial No. 90453034 (April 14, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:13 am
The Board noted that, “[w]hile actual sales are not required for statutory use in commerce, . . . [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:32 am
"Strength of Opposer's Mark: Opposer contended that its GILEAD mark is famous for pharmaceutical products. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:05 am
[W]e find that it is compromised by the initial statement to the survey participants. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
" In this case, the question was whether the Church made a sale of goods bearing the mark, in commerce regulable by Congress, before it applied to register its marks. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
Austrian company Wedl & Hofmann (W&H) applied to register the figurative mark on the left, mainly featuring the word 'Walzertraum', as a Community trade mark (CTM) for 'coffee; instant coffee; decaffeinated coffee; sugar' (Class 30), on 16 August 2005. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 9:48 am
Best W. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
The court has `broad discretion to fashion conditions of probation’ (In re Josh W. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
I conclude that the best framework is unconstitutional Conditions: the government can’t leverage its program to affect speech outside the program. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Same for a TM—recognition of a mark as a mark/name is what gives it existence. [read post]
9 May 2023, 5:00 am
W.) [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 10:43 am
Charles W. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:28 am
It was irrelevant that the name was not erroneous, since the only condition for the application of the absolute ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(j) is that the mark contains or consists of a geographical indication identifying a wine in respect of such wine not having that origin.* Likewise it made no difference that the mark applied for did not include the name el Palomar but merely the word ‘palomar’. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:45 pm
Published in Bicycle Retailer and Industry News December 17, 2013Reprinted with permission by Steven W. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:06 pm
Audi sued the defendant before the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Regional Court of Warsaw) for trade mark infringement. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:42 am
Cir. 2009) (citing W. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:13 pm
The Board concluded that "the marketing conditions do not compel a finding of likelihood of confusion, given the inherent differences between these goods. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:54 pm
Grady of Seyfarth Shaw on their Seytlines blog The Peril of the Office Server – Exton, PA lawyer Mark R. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
1883: invented marks; 1905 became a general definition w/some exclusions, e.g. of geographic marks. [read post]
