Search for: "Mark W. Davis" Results 41 - 60 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am by Roger Parloff
In January, a group of North Carolina voters filed a 34-page petition to block Rep. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Unlike registration denials under Section 1052(a), the PTO denies registration without any inquiry into whether the mark suggests a false connection between the mark and the famous person. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The topic of the intersection between private international law and IP law is continued in Chapter 2 by Graeme W. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:31 pm by dhdlaw
§ 3542(a), “[w]hen traffic-control signals are not in place or not in operation, the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within any marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection. [read post]
6 May 2021, 3:02 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
One of the most unique projects coming out of Penn Law and FPI is the Five-Year Out Academy which brings back Penn Law alumni at their five-year post-graduation mark and helps these grads navigate the next phase of their career. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
• Patricia Davis, 67, of Dallas, died January 11, 2021. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Dawn Carla Nunziato, Cheap Speech and Counterspeech by the New Intermediaries, 54 UC Davis L. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A North Carolina statute banned "[p]osting … on the Internet [any] private, personal, or sexual information pertaining to a minor" "[w]ith the intent to intimidate or torment a minor. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Andrew Appel
Everything I’ve described here is consistent with the peer-reviewed scientific paper,  Ballot-Marking Devices Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters, by Andrew W. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Davis establishes an important limitation on the exclusionary rule. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Michael Douglas
This reflects a fundamental policy consideration that ‘“parties who have made a contract should be kept to it”’.[8] Here, the parties differed on the circumstances relevant to the exercise of this discretion.[9] The plaintiffs relied upon the list of circumstances identified by Brandon J in The Eleftheria, which included ‘the relative convenience and expense of the trial’ and ‘[w]hether the plaintiffs would be prejudiced by having to sue in the… [read post]