Search for: "Mark Wells v. State of Indiana" Results 41 - 60 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
State, local, and federal governments, as well as related government agencies, enjoy a general blanket of immunity from personal injury lawsuits. [read post]
State, local, and federal governments, as well as related government agencies, enjoy a general blanket of immunity from personal injury lawsuits. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 12:07 pm
" The Indiana State Bar Association's House of Delegates has stated that "all Indiana lawyers have an ethical and a social obligation to provide uncompensated legal assistance to poor persons" and adopted an aspirational goal of fifty hours a year, or an equivalent financial contribution, for each member of the bar. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Invalidity Bones and the Cancellation of the Crystal SkullSkullduggery Rum Ltd v Globefill Incorporated [2020] ETMR 9 EUIPO Cancellation Division (October 2019)Ignore my misleading title – this is nothing to do with Indiana Jones and, in a rare positive decision for a non-traditional mark, did not lead to the cancellation of Globefill’s EUTM for the 3D shape illustrated below. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:13 am by SHG
  Via the Texas Tornado, Mark Bennett, Indiana has "undone" the ruling of its Supreme Court in Barnes v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
Expedia will list Marriott Marks listed in Exhibit G as well as its common misspelling as negative keywords as indicated in order to prevent its ads from appearing as a result of a search for those terms. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  At least, other circuits should follow Grupo Gigante and recognize the well-known marks doctrine under §43(a); territoriality has never existed in a pure state. 8. [read post]