Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
It also marked the last year of that union. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 7:44 am
Of course, anyone with an interest in the subject may wish to look at it, not least because of the pedagogical aspect of the structuring of this thesis. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 2:13 am
No LOC owing to weakness of earlier mark (BoA annulled) T-665/22, 08/11/23, SKINIDENT v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
As a follow-up to last year’s blog on United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:45 am
This year, the highlights series was produced in collaboration with IP practitioners and researchers: Clarisse Mideva, Rita Chindah, and Jessie Mgonga.Marcel Pemsel discussed the recent Advocate General's opinion in the case of EUIPO v Indo European Foods (Case C-801/21 P), which concerns the effects of Brexit on EU trade mark law after the end of the transition period. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Mark Elliott, Public Law for Everyone: The Rwanda Bill and its constitutional implications. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
Sandpiper Real Estate Fund 4 Limited Partnership v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
Imam, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon (2023) UKSC 45 Full transparency – I acted for Crisis on an intervention in this case. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
” Heldebrandt v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
” State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
This may have been a bit extreme, but given how infrequently specific performance has been ordered to remedy a failure to close, it probably was not far off the mark. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
This may have been a bit extreme, but given how infrequently specific performance has been ordered to remedy a failure to close, it probably was not far off the mark. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Not wishing to show excessive dis-favoritism, the FTC’s November 2023 complaint against Amazon (here) is the third that the agency has brought against that firm in calendar year 2023 (see here and here for the others, and that’s not counting the commission’s February 2023 statement about Amazon’s acquisition of One Medical). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
November 20, 2023 | By: Michael Shafer and Alex Butterman The legal landscape for trademark owners changed significantly in 2023 because in Spireon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:32 am
Details and registration here.Trademarks and Free SpeechLast week, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Vidal v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 2:02 am
These injuries will significant enough that they marked the complainant for some time, or that the injuries threaten the life of the complainant. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
Harrell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
Todd V. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 3:30 am
Council, Inc. v. [read post]
