Search for: "Market-Front Co. v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2013, 7:14 am
The court also pointed to Bober v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
[Courts] recognized a core principle of social responsibility that justified what was then a new form of liability: The purpose of this [product] liability is to ensure that the costs of injuries resulting from defective products are borne by the manufacturers that put such products on the market. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Over on the civil front, American Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
Superior Court of Fresno County.) [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:18 pm
South Beach Beverage Co. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Criminal law -- Evidence -- Hearsay -- Tape recording -- Trial court did not err in allowing surreptitiously recorded conversation between defendant and co-defendant in the back of a patrol car to be played at trial where defendant's side of conversation was admissible as a party admission and co-defendant's side of conversation was admissible to place defendant's statements into context -- Further, conversation… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
Superior Court (Plotkin) 194 Cal.App.4th 210 Two and a half months after the Third District filed its decision in the Cobb matter, the appellate courts’ Second District published its own opinion on inverse condemnation on April 12, 2011. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
When a plaintiff “wins” a court decision, that really means the plaintiff gets a chance to prove their case in front of a jury. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
S&P said that it was applying some new standards to its rating methodology that “focus on how institutions manage their businesses under market and economic stress. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:01 pm
Ayana Hill v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:34 am
Scott Greenfield (one of my co-defendants) instantly dubbed the suit Rakofsky v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:42 am
What is especially interesting about the court case, Associated Irritated Residents v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
” Id.Next, in Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:56 am
P&G v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
The tenant had to issue court proceedings because the landlors wouldn't co-operate with the arbitration scheme that landlordand tenants are now supposed to use when they get into a dispute. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
On the doctrinal front, given the significant liability implications of many director decisions, sorting out the extent to which courts will look at the substantive merits of those decisions obviously is imperative. [read post]
