Search for: "Marks v. Cross"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 10:42 am
Overall Conclusions In Section V, the Report concludes that changes to IP laws are not currently necessary to address the use of NFTs as the unique aspects of the technology generally do not raise new IP problems. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
See, e.g., Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Asa result, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment andDENIES the Government’s motion to dismiss and alternative cross-motion forsummary judgment.I. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
In Evans v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
No matter the outcome, the case aims to provide clarity around whether ethical considerations of sourcing immense amounts of copyrighted material—instrumental in training in AI image generators—cross the line into unlawful conduct. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
” (Reference is to the use of Bad Spaniels as a mark for dog toys). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
Last July, in Missouri v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
The settlement relates to claims of unlawful intrusion on 115 stories and marks the end of a four-year-battle between the prince and the publisher. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
The Court began by noting that, in order to assess whether the distinctive character of the Mark had been altered, it needed to carry out an assessment of the distinctive and dominant character of the added elements, based of the intrinsic qualities of each of those elements, as well as of the relative position of the various elements within the arrangement of the mark (Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – Plásticos Hidrosolubles (green cycles), T‑78/19).It… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
The court identified three errors, (i) defendant’s prior record level being identified as V instead of IV, (ii) the marking of box 12 of the sentencing sheet for committing an offense while on pretrial release, and (iii) not marking the box on the aggravating factors sheet noting that defendant entered a plea to the aggravating factor. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
To change the standards in false advertising, in TM, or to create a new cross-context standard? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
First Indus., L.P., 158 Ohio App. 3d 792, 794 (2004) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
