Search for: "Marks v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2017, 9:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a significant opinion on the topic of genericness, Elliott v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
However, in this case, the magistrate report is so harsh and unforgiving towards ConsumerAffairs that it has to be wondering how it can win in the district court. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:38 am
Supreme Court, In U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:34 am
The Second Circuit reverses the district court’s nominative use determination, remanding the case back to the district court to apply the legal principles it lays out in the opinion. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
MARK S. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
BISHOP, Appellee. 3rd District. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:44 am
Cline attorney Patrick Mincey even cited Marbury v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
Inasmuch as Defendants did not reside or work for gain in India, it was only the District Court Arizona that was the appropriate forum/forum conveniens to decide the dispute.36. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:48 am
Sindt Trucking Inc. , Oct. 13, 2014, Florida’s First District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: GEICO v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:48 am
District Court for the Northern District of California in Barker v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:32 am
The Libertarian National Committee sued and the district court enjoined them from using the Libertarian Party mark. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
The Southern District of New York issued an order today in the Tiffany v. eBay case, where Tiffany had sued eBay under a variety of trademark theories over the actions of users who sold knock-offs using the "Tiffany" name in their auction titles or descriptions.There's lots to write about this 66-page decision, including the standard for contributory trademark infringement, duties to police, etc., but I thought I would post a little on the issue of… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:54 am
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
The district court entered a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Paragon Defendants from manufacturing or selling their products. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
” (Quoting In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1161-1162.) [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:56 pm
In TBI Caribbean Company LTD, etc., et al., v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
(Posner, Obama, Sunstein, Meltzer & Epstein, etc. were all still around). [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
Bold applicants may even argue that the Court majority at least implicitly endorsed the district court’s reasoning that domain names are usually inherently distinctive b/c everyone understands that they are exclusive—but trademark function is a requirement even for matter that could in theory be inherently distinctive, so we might see more attention to that point. [read post]
