Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government"
Results 41 - 60
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Oregon, which remains among the longest running federal district court cases in history. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
William Marbury was appointed by President John Adams to be a justice of peace for the County of Washington in the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Except for a time in local government as the District of Columbia’s Corporation Counsel, his entire career prior to the LDF directorship was at WilmerHale. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
His right originates in an act of congress passed in February, 1801, concerning the district of Columbia. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
Ten years later, while in private practice, he defended the constitutionality of a District of Columbia gun-control measure in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
This case involves a notorious murder of a woman in the District of Columbia in 1984, and whether certain evidence the government had withheld from the defense was “material” under Brady v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
He’s best known for Brown v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Ever since the Court’s watershed decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:43 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Columbia Lakes Homeowners Ass'n, 325 S.W.3d 791, 798 (Tex. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
As John Marshall explained in McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
It wasn’t until District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”And, Justice Marshall was right to remind all of us that the right to vote “is the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative government. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
Justices of the Supreme Court rarely give public comments on words or actions of members of the elected branches of the federal government. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
The panel also rejected the district court’s conclusion that the District of Columbia’s legislation extending the statute of limitations for appellant’s claims violated the separation of powers by altering a final judgment, and for the same basic reason: the District of Columbia did not “revive finally adjudicated claims” by amending the limitations period because the complaint had been dismissed without… [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
Ginsburg’s opinion sides with federal district court review, rejecting the government’s argument that mixed claims be split between a district court and the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:28 am
However, Chief Justice Marshall famously said in McCulloch v. [read post]
