Search for: "Martin v. Reed" Results 41 - 60 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
"The DJ also features CAFA Conundrum: Diversity is What Counts, by Reed Smith appellate specialists Jim Martin and David de Jesus, about the controversy over the scope of CAFA's appellate review provision, and noting that the 9th Circuit recently joined "the 5th, 6th, and 8th Circuits in holding that CAFA's appellate review provision is limited to remand orders where a party claims diversity jurisdiction under CAFA" in Chan Healthcare Group, PS v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Unclear how far the Court had gone, and remains unclear; Court hasn’t taken a commercial speech case since then, though it has had Reed v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 9 May 2016, Langstaff J handed down judgment in the case of Oyston v Reed ([2016] EWHC 1067 (QB)). [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
” In just one-and-a-half pages (more than one-tenth of which consisted of a single quote from the Court’s 1816 decision in Martin v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Patrick Yingling of Reed Smith on Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
  Full disclosure:  David is a Reed Smith case, so this entry is also non-RS.Sergeants Benevolent Ass’n Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
 Why, oh why, did Steve Martin even attempt to remake The Pink Panther? [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday morning the Court heard oral arguments in Reed v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Sims v Jooste (No.2) [2014] WASC 373, Kenneth Martin J dismissed an action for libel based on publication on a website known as HotCopper. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 12:36 am
He explained its meaning as follows:"[T]his is my take on Copyright v Technology: two subjects encapsulated in a small container, doomed to interact, but both resisting to adapt or combine. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
  Perhaps the most important take-away from the decision in Martin v. [read post]