Search for: "Martinez v. Combs"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:40 pm
Combs. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
The Court of Appeal reversed, holding as follows: Under Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
See Martinez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Combs (2010) 49 Cal.4th 35, 52-57, 73, and IWC wage order No. 1-2001, subdivision 2(D)-(F) (Cal. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Bement (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1075, and Martinez v. [read post]
Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers: Supreme Court Orders Supplemental Briefing on Martinez v. Combs
12 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
In Ayala v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:24 am
Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341 or Martinez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
Relying on Martinez v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
While the Supreme Court did not accept the workers' further argument, based on Martinez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
The Court next considered whether application of Martinez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court did reject an additional part of the workers' argument, based on a 2010 Supreme Court decision, Martinez v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
More importantly, the Court does not discuss the impact of Martinez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:56 am
See Slip Opinion, at 23-24.In support of this construction, the Court noted that the California Supreme Court concluded in Martinez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Recently, the workers filed a supplemental brief under Rule of Court 8.520(d) addressing Martinez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Still well short of the 5 years that they spent on Martinez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:10 am
(See Martinez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Last week we filed a supplemental brief under Rule of Court 8.520(d)(1) to address the impact of Martinez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
Bement (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1075, 1083, disapproved on another ground in Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:39 pm
In the case of Martinez v. [read post]