Search for: "Martinez v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
” The Issue In agreeing to review the case, the California Supreme Court defined the issue on appeal as whether, in a misclassification case, a class may be certified based on the expansive definition of employee as outlined in the California Wage Order language construed in Martinez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 8:46 am by Earl Drott
Related Blog Posts: Texas Court Holds that Trucker’s Employer is Possible “Responsible Third Party” in Product Liability Suit Arising from Truck Braking System – In re Volvo Group North America Texas Court Dismisses Widower’s Claims Against Driver’s Employer Based on Negligent Entrustment and Vicarious Liability – Martinez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1026; Reynolds v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The Supreme Court did reject an additional part of the workers' argument, based on a 2010 Supreme Court decision, Martinez v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
VA084675) APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:16 am by Garret Murai
Thereafter, on July 6, 2012, Paniagua Construction and Martinez filed a notice of appeal with the San Francisco County Superior Court. [read post]