Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 41 - 60
of 805
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Jen Patja Howell shared a discussion on the Lawfare Podcast about Vance, Mazars and their implications moving forward with Benjamin Wittes, Margaret Taylor, Scott Anderson, Quinta Jurecic and Molly Reynolds: Quinta Jurecic also shared a livestream of a conversation about the two cases on “In Lieu of Fun” with Marty Lederman, Dahlia Lithwick, Leah Litman, Margaret Taylor, Wittes, and Kate Klonick: In the wake of President Trump's commutation Friday evening of… [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:47 pm
Vance, with Marty Lederman, Dahlia Lithwick, Leah Litman and Margaret Taylor. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 4:07 am
Howell also shared a discussion on the Lawfare Podcast between Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, and Marty Lederman covering the government’s legal arguments in its effort to obtain a temporary restraining order (TRO) to prevent the publication and distribution of John Bolton’s book. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The ongoing legal battle over former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s book is in large part a fight over classification. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Adam Cox, Marty Lederman and Cristina Rodriguez provide a thorough primer on those issues here. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 10:39 am
Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman assessed this government lawsuit. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman offered questions for Judge Royce Lamberth to ask the government during a hearing considering a government motion in the case regarding John Bolton’s new memoir. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:32 pm
Jack Goldsmith & Marty Lederman at Just Security; it's a factually and legally complicated area, which I don't know enough about, but on which they are experts. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman assessed the U.S. government’s civil suit against former National Security Adviser John Bolton. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:52 pm
Marty Lederman (Georgetown) for the pointer; he also adds that California offered this justification for the distinction in its brief: In the view of state public-health officials, large public gatherings pose a heightened risk of spread because attendees are "stationary in close quarters for extended periods of time. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 6:40 pm
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:11 pm
Marty Lederman critiques the two rulings here. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman unpacks the opinion, concluding that “the Supreme Court just stayed a provision of a district court preliminary injunction that does not exist, and in so doing imposed a restraint on the franchise of Wisconsin voters that Wisconsin law itself doesn’t require. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 7:56 am
And on Twitter, law professor Marty Lederman offers this response to Blackman’s essay. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman weighs in on two requests for expedited review of a lower court ruling that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate is unconstitutional, arguing that “the Court ought to grant the petitions (and thus the motions to expedite) because of the stratagem that two judges on the Fifth Circuit employed here and the foreseeable effects their manipulations will have. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 8:43 am
” For instance, they might conclude, for the sorts of reasons Marty Lederman has discussedon this blog, that “impartiality” must be understood loosely, perhaps even aspirationally, in the inherently politicized impeachment context. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:44 am
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman remarks on how the briefing in a landmark 1926 Supreme Court case involving “whether Congress can give the Senate a role in the removal of an inferior officer” shows “how very different Supreme Court practice is today than it was a century ago. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 3:21 am
At Balkinization, Marty Lederman addresses “the importance of the … cases[,] the weakness of Trump’s constitutional arguments … and … what the Court is likely to do with those two cases. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 5:37 am
“Understanding the two Mazars subpoena cases pending in the Supreme Court”: Marty Lederman has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:17 am
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman offers “some thoughts on three issues the Justices and defendants’ advocates raised. [read post]
