Search for: "Marty Peters"
Results 41 - 60
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 10:16 pm
This two-part test was first coined in the Sid & Marty Krofft Television Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am
” However the Washington Examiner cites Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook, who stated that “the most important thing, we believe, in the Libyan situation is the formation of this government, the strengthening of this government, support for this government, so that it can handles these security matters on their own. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
At Immigration Prof Blog, Peter Margulies responds to some of the arguments and commentary on work-authorization regulations, while Josh Blackman and Cristina Rodriguez discuss the case in a podcast for the National Constitution Center. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 6:09 am
Peter Margulies Roger Williams University School of Law Just as Solicitor General Donald Verrilli was off-base at Monday’s SCOTUS argument on DAPA in claiming that asylees lack a pathway to citizenship (see my post here), the usually careful SG... [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
Jack responded to Marty Lederman on the Obama administration's embrace of the Bush doctrine of preemption. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
The Ninth Circuit uses the extrinsic/intrinsic test created in the Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 10:40 am
ADA Compliance & Defense Lawyer update: Lawmakers consider steps to limit abusive ADA lawsuits 2016年2月23日… [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 10:40 am
ADA Compliance & Defense Lawyer update: Lawmakers consider steps to limit abusive ADA lawsuits 2016年2月23日… [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:57 am
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in the case, with posts from Letitia Saucedo, Steve Legomsky, Shoba Wadhia, and Peter Margulies. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 5:14 am
Peter. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Peter Margulies disputed the Court’s decision to vacate the military commission conviction of Al Bahlul, arguing that the Court’s interpretation of Congress’s Article I authority over military commissions was too narrow. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm
Peter Margulies discussed the D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
Cody linked us to the documents, as well as a summary of their contents by CNN’s Peter Bergen. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 5:46 pm
FTC Says Smartphone Apps Don’t Detect Skin Cancer – Washington, DC lawyer Peter Miller of Crowell Moring on the firm’s blog, Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer Beer Delivery to Your Home – Are We There Yet? [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:41 am
I've got to say thank you to Peter, Paul and Mary, who I knew all separately before they ever became a group. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
Disagreements about the significance of congressional silence are at the heart of pretty much every published critique of the President’s actions that we’ve read since Thursday—by Peter Margulies, Peter Schuck, David Martin, David Rivkin, and Elizabeth Price Foley. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:30 am
” (This in-the-weeds slipperiness is why I am not at all confident that the precedent can be confined in the way, for example, that Marty Lederman opines.) [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 1:15 pm
Impeachment would be an uncalled-for overreaction, as Peter Schuck explains here. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am
Commentary on the case comes from Akiva Shapiro in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Garrett Epps for The Atlantic, Eugene Kontorovich of The Volokh Conspiracy (parts one and two), Marty Lederman at Just Security, Jack Goldsmith at Lawfare, Michael Ramsey at The Originalism Blog, Gershom Gorenberg in The American Prospect, and Peter Spiro at Opinio Juris. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
Later, she responded to Marty Lederman’s critique of her article. [read post]
