Search for: "Matter of Adoption of LC"
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 9:50 am
The lawbook referred to above is a set of laws adopted in Iceland under Norwegian rule in 1281, known as the Jónsbók. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
In response to these arguments, HTQC on behalf of the Respondent clearly adopted the reasoning of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
Michael, was “adopted in an age of primitive industrial development . . . when any practical use of the upper air was not considered or thought possible. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm
It also confuses matters with “airborne transmission” to indicate inhalation exposure exclusively at long distances and does not consider inhalation exposure via the same aerosols at short distances.This artificial distinction needs to be replaced with up-to-date terminology [10], as advocated by the National Academies workshop on Airborne Transmission [11], focused on routes of exposure via a) touch, b) large droplets sprayed onto the body, and c) inhalation of small aerosol… [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
He noted that the Fourth Amendment requires, but the OFCCP has not adopted, the Fourth Amendment procedural protections of: subpoenas for contractor objections to off-site investigations, as required by the High Court’s 1946 decision in Oklahoma Press Pub Co v Walling (10 LC ¶51,222), and warrants for contractor objections to on-site investigations, as required by Supreme Court’s 1978 ruling in Marshall v Barlow’s Inc (436 U.S. 307). [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:30 pm
Harold Ickes (center); Edward Taylor (left) LC[Longtime LHB readers will recall that for the exam in my legal history course I write an essay about some regulatory regime I did not cover in class and ask students to compare it with the ones we did. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm
And then, there is Nemcova v Fairfield Rents Ltd (2016) UKUT 303 (LC) (our report). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Invs., LC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
Nonetheless, the discussion itself may well have substantial implications for the tenor and trajectories of discussions about complicity as a matter of civil liability and as a factor in the way that complicity is understood both as a moral matter and as part of corporate responsibility to respect human rights under the 2nd Pillar of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights and related normative standards. [read post]
