Search for: "Matter of Application of Farley"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
Doesn’t matter if the mark isn’t eligible for protection in certain jurisdictions – geographic indicators. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
Mark Martins raised with the court a perceived inconsistency between Farley’s written acknowledgement of his responsibilities as defense counsel and the applicable regulations and commission rulings. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
However, capacity doctrines are discriminatory in application. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
The amended hunter harassment law does not target all First Amendment activities that concern hunting as a subject matter. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
There can be no correct application of Article 3 if the components of Article 12 are not respected. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:47 pm
JWOWW is the stage name of Jenni Farley, whose life is featured on the reality TV Series Jersey Shore. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
As a result, Grant was at risk of having to pay £10 million in legal costs if the matter proceeded to trial and reluctantly accepted the offer. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Occupy, Occupy Wall Street, 99%, 1%: 47 TM applications for Occupy [X] in the past year, 11 for 99%/1%. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
On the same day, there was a case management conference in the case of Farley and others v Paymaster (1836) Ltd t/a Equiniti QB-2021-001497. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
And one recent Sixth Circuit court case apparently had no understanding at all of incontestability, deeming it applicable to a mark that had been cancelled (and then subsequently registered by the same party, but not for five years).General unfamiliarity with incontestability probably explains why many parties who would benefit from pointing out erroneous incontestability designations fail to do so. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Section 1052 does not clearly require rejecting an application or treating as unprotected a mark that was once generic for the goods in question. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
In Cariou, the ordered destruction of the Prince works clearly mattered to the Second Circuit’s reversal. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
High-profile, ongoing M&A matters include an application to block Air Canada’s proposed joint venture with United Continental, the investigation of the Maple/TMX transaction, and an application to dissolve a completed transaction that was not large enough to trigger a pre-closing notification requirement. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Trademark 1 Paul Heald, Testing Theories of Tarnishment in Trademark and Copyright Law Tarnishment should be treated like false advertising: you should have to prove some (likely) damage to your TM to win, rather than presumptions. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IPKat) ECJ: Designs and a matter of discretion: will Cassina go with the Flos? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(IPKat) ECJ: Designs and a matter of discretion: will Cassina go with the Flos? [read post]
