Search for: "Matter of Application of Graham"
Results 41 - 60
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Federal laws like the Internal Revenue Code, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Graham-Leech-Biliey, the Fair & Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) or other Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Rules, state data security, data breach, identity theft or other privacy rules or both are just a few of the many and constantly expanding regulatory requirements that can apply. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:41 am
Chris Graham: Hi David. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 2:21 am
The Commission proposal adopted on 25 May 2016 would further extend the Directive’s applicability to on-demand providers and internet platforms. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:16 pm
Applicants must be enrolled in an accredited U.S. law school at the time of application and throughout their internship. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 3:02 am
[2012] Fam Law 1267, Peter Graham Harris, Oxford Centre for Family Law & Policy and Exeter College, University of Oxford). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
Against this background, the obviousness or nonobviousness of the subject matter is determined. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 7:39 am
" "There is no necessary inconsistency between the [TSM] test and the Graham analysis. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:54 am
As originally published in the Daily Journal of Commerce Authored by: Clayton Graham There are some good tidings for developers even in the gloom of a sluggish economy. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:01 pm
What is beyond doubt, however, is that Section 127, and its application to social media, is the result of historical accident not conscious design. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm
As with the needle in the arm, reasonableness of the reaction is simply an irrelevant concept of no application. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Assailed from all quarters for being not tough enough, for being too tough, for being fundamentally misconceived, for threatening freedom of expression, for technological illiteracy, for threatening privacy, for excessive Ministerial powers, or occasionally for the sin of not being some other Bill entirely – and yet enjoying almost universal cross-party Parliamentary support – the UK’s Online Safety Bill is now limping its way through the House of Lords. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm
Whether that is correct as a matter of economics is not for me to judge. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
He further testified, in contrast to the others, that he had promptly reported the matter to his grandmother, who, in turn, had reported the matter to his mother. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:53 pm
Actionability brings into play possible defences such as (as reframed under the Bill) truth, honest opinion, responsible publication on matters of public interest and so on. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:57 am
., decided Friday by Judge James Graham (S.D. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:39 am
We do so because the "factors articulated in Graham, and other factors bearing on the reasonableness of a particular application of force are not to be considered in a vacuum but only in relation to the amount of force used to effect a particular seizure. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:30 am
However if any one of numerous defences, such as truth, honest opinion, publication on matters of public interest and many others, is established, the statement is lawful. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 8:09 am
In fact, it would probably be prudent for all companies in the U.S. that collect or use customer location data to become familiar with the privacy regimes associated with medical records (HIPAA), consumer credit (Fair Credit Reporting Act) and financial information (Graham -Leach- Bliley Act), as Congress and the Federal Trade Commission appear to have a framework they like to use on privacy matters. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
If we think – and I suspect many don’t – that the difference matters, then to have them all swept up together under the banner of regulation is unhelpful. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm
The rule of law objection to vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned: “Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
