Search for: "Matter of Booker"
Results 41 - 60
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2018, 4:27 pm
Preserves the staffing, documents, and materials of the investigation while the matter is pending…” [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:10 am
’” Booker has co-sponsored legislation with Sen. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
In all likelihood, the courts aren't going to hold the Apprendi/Ring/Blakely/Booker "rule" retroactive no matter when you file, but just in case there's no reason to blow the statute of limitations unnecessarily, too.-- Peter Goldberger, Ardmore, PASo you have been warned now. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
At the time Mr Booker wrote his article 7 judgments about this case had been published, each of them within a matter of hours of their delivery by the judge. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:12 pm
The majority says yes; Judge Booker says no.Military Rule of Evidence 414(a) provides: "In a court-martial in which the accused is charged with an offense of child molestation, evidence of the accused's commission of one or more offenses of CHILD MOLESTATION is admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant. [read post]
10 Jun 2005, 5:37 am
In a Booker remand in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
But, Selya says that Booker came before Work, and Booker doesn't undermine Work, and whatever the case, Selya says that Booker doesn't matter that much and matters only reduces Booker to only this: "The short of it is that Booker constrains judicial factfinding only in a mandatory guideline sentencing regime. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 6:06 am
" This CLR note on Booker is not yet on-line, but in the meantime I recommend everyone make sure they've read this student note from April's Harvard Law Review entitled "A Matter of Life and Death: The Effect of Life-Without-Parole Statutes on Capital Punishment. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:45 am
" In the immediate wake of Booker, federal prosecutors often contested and/or complained if a district judge sought to reduce a based on a defendant's cooperation absent a government 5K motion. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:15 pm
(This matters because Booker might allow the defendant to escape a life sentence). [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
Even in those cases not held in public the press may ask to sit in and listen, and if they think it is a matter of public interest to ask to report the case. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 3:01 pm
In imposing a sentence of 37 months the district court stated, "Under Booker, there is a presumption in favor of the Guidelines because the Guidelines express the public policy and the intention of Congress as to the court's authority of these matters and the considerations that the court should address. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:36 pm
At the time Mr Booker wrote his article 7 judgments about this case had been published, each of them within a matter of hours of their delivery by the judge. [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:05 am
This case has bounced up and down as the district court and the Fifth Circuit try to figure out post-Booker sentencing rules. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 11:04 pm
W e note, however, that, as a practical matter, there is essentially only a two-way circuit split between those circuits applying the "plainly unreasonable" standard of review (Fourth, Seventh) and those applying "unreasonableness" review (Second, Third, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh), with two circuits undecided (Sixth, Fifth), and two which have yet to confront the issue (First, D.C.).Having evaluated these various approaches, we find that, while the Supreme Court in … [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 9:00 am
Such disparities are troubling, but what makes them troubling is not that two codefendants received different sentences per se, but that they received different sentences based on a consideration that shouldn't really matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:30 am
Booker v. [read post]
30 Sep 2006, 9:17 pm
It will still be a matter of what judge you are before to determine how severe your sentence will be. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:13 pm
Senators Elizabeth Warren and Cory Booker cited their Vincent Sliwoski in a letter to Merrick Garland, the U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 5:49 pm
The five Booker judges, who were unanimous in their decision, cited the novel’s inventive comic approach to the thorny issues of racial identity and injustice... [read post]
