Search for: "Matter of Bradbury" Results 41 - 60 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 11:40 am by Jack Goldsmith
  On this topic I recommend this op-ed by Bush OLC-ers Steve Bradbury and John Elwood. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:45 am by John Elwood
  This is relevant because the two houses have used pro forma sessions for some time (at least during the post-WWII period) to be in session as a formal matter to avoid running afoul of that three-day rule. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:40 pm by Mandelman
Subscribe to Mandelman Matters and read his blog post without fail; 2. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm by Lovechilde
Since at least 1968, there has, however, been no broad prohibition against government employees writing about political matters or matters of public concern. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:44 am by Duncan Hollis
It bodes well for the rest of the day, which will conclude with a Keynote Address by Steven Bradbury, formerly a Principal Deputy in OLC. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:04 pm by John Elwood
Bradbury, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, issued a memorandum entitled “Best Practices for OLC Opinions. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:37 am by AskPat
The publisher withdrew the edited version in 1980 after Bradbury discovered what they had done (Sova, Dawn B. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm by Tom K.
All that matters to the government is that, in February 2008, Mr. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:14 pm by Mandelman
  I thought it would be worth reading it for numerous reasons… but, it’s of course up to you… Mandelman THE MANDELMAN MATTERS READER WRITES: How can an unemployed person taking on even more loans, for what is most likely a well-underwater home mortgage situation, be a good thing? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The class will also discuss the various federal, state and local taxes related to such a transaction.Instructor: John Bradbury, Esq., Law Offices of John BradburyCLE Credit: 3 Areas of Professional Practice CreditsSponsor: Bank of AmericaClick here to register for my Coop and Condo class. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:21 pm by Larry Siems, The Torture Report
Document: “Generic description” of the CIA RDI process prepared for Dan Levin, discussing 5/10/05 Bradbury combined techniques memo and CAT Article 16 memo. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:55 pm by David Luban
(Actually, even the constitutional point is wrong: the Supreme Court has held that in some circumstances, the Due Process clause guarantees counsel to people in non-criminal matters. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am by David Luban
It had to happen, as night follows day.After David Margolis concluded that the Bybee Memos showed mere "poor judgment" rather than professional misconduct, it was only a matter of time before someone would spin Margolis into an endorsement of the memos. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:01 pm
Front-line officers would then be permitted to carry out the instructions of such policy makers--even if those instructions appear to authorize illegal activity (such as waterboarding)--but would otherwise be held to obey the letter of the law.The chief difficulty with this Nixonian view (if the President does it, it's not illegal) is that it would entail that Cheney, Rumsfeld, Addington, Bybee, Yoo, Bradbury, et al were actually acting within their authority when they concluded that… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:18 pm
Bradbury, then acting assistant attorney general, to John A. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:05 pm
As then President Bush said about his own interview, it was a criminal matter: "In terms of whether or not I need advice from my counsel, this is a criminal matter, it's a serious matter, I have met with an attorney to determine whether or not I need his advice. [read post]