Search for: "Matter of Complaint Regarding Annexation" Results 41 - 60 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm by Eric Alexander
   Did we miss the D.N.J. moving to the Second Circuit or Michigan annexing Texas? [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Blogspot
LORD MANCE (with whom Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption agree)Introduction 1- By its judgment in this appeal dated 24 March 2010 the Supreme Court referred to the Court of Justice five questions regarding the nature and assessment of the concept of "paid annual leave" in articles 7 of Council Directives 93/104/EC and 2003/88/EC and clause 3 of the European Agreement annexed to and intended to be implemented under Council Directive 2000/79/EC. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Kader Kadem
HXZH34FFD2CVLORD MANCE (with whom Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption agree)Introduction1- By its judgment in this appeal dated 24 March 2010 the Supreme Court referred to the Court of Justice five questions regarding the nature and assessment of the concept of "paid annual leave" in articles 7 of Council Directives 93/104/EC and 2003/88/EC and clause 3 of the European Agreement annexed to and intended to be implemented under Council Directive… [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Unknown
HXZH34FFD2CVLORD MANCE (with whom Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption agree)Introduction1- By its judgment in this appeal dated 24 March 2010 the Supreme Court referred to the Court of Justice five questions regarding the nature and assessment of the concept of "paid annual leave" in articles 7 of Council Directives 93/104/EC and 2003/88/EC and clause 3 of the European Agreement annexed to and intended to be implemented under Council Directive… [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:59 pm
A reporter said that, the plaintiff commenced this action by filing a summons and complaint on June 18, 2010. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:59 pm
A reporter said that, the plaintiff commenced this action by filing a summons and complaint on June 18, 2010. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 1:38 am
In the case on hand, particularly, in para 4 of the complaint, except the mere bald and cursory statement with regard to the appellant, the complainant has not specified her role in the day to day affairs of the Company. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:38 am by Lennert Breuker
’ (Judgment p.28).Whereas Thailand complained about several other regions, she remained silent about the matter of Preah Vihear. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Hungarian court referred to the New York courts the issues regarding the distribution of property located in New York. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
The trial court was therefore unable to exercise its subject matter jurisdiction over the petition for remonstrance, and we conclude that it did not err in granting the City's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. * * * The Remonstrators also appear to argue that their complaint raises a claim for declaratory judgment that the annexation ordinance is invalid because of certain due process violations committed by the City. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:19 am by Stephen Bilkis
Stovall and his affidavit annexed to the petition were not required as a matter of law. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 6:48 am
The US Complaint According to the request for consultations, the US complaint includes two claims. [read post]
This was not required if the third party was “acting as an agent to perform task(s) on behalf of and under the instructions of the organization” [read: processor] (See Onward Transfer principle, Safe Harbor Decision 2000/520/EC, Annex I). [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Irrespective of that fact the [patent proprietor] was not entitled to interpret the communication annexed to the summons as an invitation to unroll the case afresh in order to reorient it by amending its requests. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:50 am by Jennifer Moore
If you require legal advice regarding matters of parental responsibility please do not hesitate to get in touch with one our specialist solicitors. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The USTR complaint sets out four arguments against Canada’s (TRQ) allocation measures[6] : Canada is setting aside and reserving a portion of the quota to processors. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 8:07 am
Vietnam reserves the right to raise additional claims and legal matters during the course of the consultations. [read post]