Search for: "Matter of Costello" Results 41 - 60 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the address of either party and any child or children is unknown and not a matter of public record, or is subject to an existing confidentiality order pursuant to DRL section 254 or FCA section 154-b, such applications may be brought in the county where the judgment was entered; and it is further(4) Additional Requirement with Respect to Uncontested and Contested Judgments of Divorce. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the address of either party and any child or children is unknown and not a matter of public record, or is subject to an existing confidentiality order pursuant to DRL section 254 or FCA section 154-b, such applications may be brought in the county where the judgment was entered; and it is further(4) Additional Requirement with Respect to Uncontested and Contested Judgments of Divorce. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am by Hayley Evans, Shannon Togawa Mercer
As Chris Mirasola describes, the ECJ must jump through a number of hoops in adjudicating these eleven questions as a matter of EU law before the Irish High Court can proceed in Schrems 2.0. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:03 am by Rebecca Jeschke
Inherent in that objective is our desire to take a thoughtful approach to enforcement matters. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:04 pm by Coral Beach
It’s no laughing matter that children in Tennessee are fighting for their lives. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Chris Mirasola
Within the EU, due to Article 4(2), this is a matter covered exclusively by the law of EU member States. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 1:32 pm by Jeffrey Lichtman
Noerdlinger as well as filing a lawsuit against Grootenboer, Costello and the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office for the deprivation of Mr. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 8:19 am by jefferyscholar
Noerdlinger as well as filing a lawsuit against Grootenboer, Costello and the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office for the deprivation of Mr. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:03 am by danny
The judge in the matter, Justice Caroline Costello, said there were “well-founded concerns” that the contractual clauses used by Facebook don’t provide the kind of privacy safeguards required under European law. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Costello, 304 A.D.2d 517, 519, 757 N.Y.S.2d 588, 590 (2nd Dept. 2003); Fiedler v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Costello, 304 A.D.2d 517, 519, 757 N.Y.S.2d 588, 590 (2nd Dept. 2003); Fiedler v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Harvey Bigelow sent two letters to Michael Costello, an elected town council member; both were insulting, and one was vulgar. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
Suave, well-mannered criminals, like Frank Costello and Bugsy Siegel were viewed by a national audience. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:24 pm by Amy Howe
The case arose when World Fuel Services delivered fuel to a ship while it was in Singapore; the contract specified that it would be governed by U.S. maritime law, including for maritime liens, no matter where the fuel was supplied. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 8:29 pm by Jon Katz
Her collision with Costello in the wheelchair made matters worse. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
   The SDNY found that a sock puppet version of the Abbot & Costello routine "Who's on First" was a transformative fair use "as a matter of law" and dismissed the copyright claims of the owner to a film containing the routine. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
   The SDNY found that a sock puppet version of the Abbot & Costello routine "Who's on First" was a transformative fair use "as a matter of law" and dismissed the copyright claims of the owner to a film containing the routine. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
   The SDNY found that a sock puppet version of the Abbot & Costello routine "Who's on First" was a transformative fair use "as a matter of law" and dismissed the copyright claims of the owner to a film containing the routine. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 10:59 am by Alexander Kaplan
In a unanimous 3-0 ruling, the Second Circuit ruled that a Broadway play’s verbatim performance of a full minute from the iconic Abbott and Costello routine, “Who’s on First,” in a scene between an introverted, small-town boy and his demonic sock puppet, was not transformative or otherwise fair use as a matter of law. [read post]