Search for: "Matter of DN" Results 41 - 60 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2011, 10:13 pm by Milton Mueller
This kind of direct state control over content-related matters sets an ominous precedent for the future of Internet governance. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:33 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  It is useful to remember that the DNS is, in effect, the address book of the internet. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:03 am by Travis Crabtree
  Usually, copyright disputes are a private matter between the alleged owner and the infringer. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
(Examples: ISPs, mobile carriers, content delivery networks, and DNS providers.) [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:18 pm
Ordering that the DNS records be removed is draconian yet inadequate - not what you’d expect a judge to be doing. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:39 am
The White House, after lengthy analysis of the matter, concluded that "[p]roposed laws must not tamper with the technical architecture of the Internet through manipulation of the . . . [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm by peteboyd
 Do you like jumping into a new situation each day and getting results, no matter the task? [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:40 pm by Giancarlo Frosio
” This makes it more difficult for users to circumvent this ban, as the Google’s free public DNS service has initially been used to that effect. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Ben
”[2] This decision effectively limits the costs recoverable by a successful litigant as a matter of course in copyright litigation and in “exceptional” trademark and patent cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 2:52 pm
Is this really one of the most important matters on the California Supreme Court's docket? [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
They answered every question I had very promptly, usually within 15 minutes and it didn’t seem to matter what time of the day I was asking it. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:04 am by Eric
The court says flatly: "as a matter of law, third level domain names are not covered by the ACPA. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:29 pm by Ernesto Falcon
The FCC’s insistence that DNS lookups are a separate class of services is dishonest. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:53 am by Diana L. Skaggs
  CA held that Family Court’s finding that D.N. was abused or neglected was erroneous as a matter of law because the court did not determine the truth or falsity of the allegations in the complaint and relied on information outside the record and as a result the conclusion that D.N. is abused or neglected is not based on substantial evidence. [read post]