Search for: "Matter of Gomez v Gomez"
Results 41 - 60
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 6:39 am
The case is Gomez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Rene-Gomez, 2019 WL 4933687 (Wash. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
As an initial matter, the statute does not apply to non-attorneys, such as the Individual Defendants (see Neroni v Follender, 137 AD3d 1336, 1338 [3d Dept 2016], appeal dismissed 27 NY3d 1147 [2016], rearg denied 28 NY3d 1024 [2016]). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
On Tuesday 22 October 2019, the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Mohammed v Gomez & Ors (Trinidad and Tobago). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
Gomez, No. 03-06-00225-CV, 2006 Tex. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:55 am
Danielsen, partner and co-chair of KDV’s General Liability Defense Practice Group Summary In Brito v Gomez, 2019 NY Slip Op 06452 (Decided September 9, 2019), the Court of Appeals (New York’s highest Court) has drastically undercut well-settled First Department precedent, which has historically restricted discovery of prior medical conditions in personal injury cases, unless a plaintiff affirmatively claimed the injury in the lawsuit. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 5:34 pm
This decision contrasts nicely with that in Gomez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Gomez is interested in moving to. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 12:24 pm
No, says the Nebraska Supreme Court in today's unanimous Gomez v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:56 am
Gomez Garcia, 274 F.Supp.3d 339, 346 (D. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm
See Gomez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm
The state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Jan. 18 in the case of State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
Gomez v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
In Gomez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 9:31 am
TCL v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:00 am
" Citing Matter of McComb v Reasoner, 29 AD3d 795, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals has interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2) to "require[ ] that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental department's chain of command" and that the Court of Appeals has further interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2) to:1. require that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental… [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:03 am
Inherent in that objective is our desire to take a thoughtful approach to enforcement matters. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 1:22 pm
† The decision in Gomez v. [read post]
