Search for: "Matter of Holmes v Brown"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm
Holmes, 385 F.3d 786, 789-90 (D.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
In the case of Peter Holmes a Court v Tony Papaconstuntinos [2011] NSWCA 59 the Court of Appeal of New South Wales allowed the appeal of businessman Peter Holmes a Court holding that the publications complained of were published on an occasion of qualified privilege. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 552 (1896) (Harlan, J., dissenting), overruled by Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
But don’t get carried away with such peripheral matters: your real job is to make the most out of the case-law. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Supreme Court, March 03, 2008 Boulware v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
In Sentient Jet LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
Young Bickel served when Brown v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
Young Bickel served when Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Question: Apart from his opinion in Brown v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 7:14 am
See Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
