Search for: "Matter of Kaufman v Kaufman"
Results 41 - 60
of 192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
The Court noted: "Since the law favors the free and unobstructed use of real property, a restrictive covenant must be strictly construed against those seeking to enforce it, and may not be given an interpretation extending beyond the clear meaning of its terms (see Witter v Taggart, 78 NY2d 234, 237-238; Wechsler v Gasparrini, 40 AD3d 976; Liebowitz v Forman, 22 AD3d 530, 531; Kaufman v Fass, 302 AD2d 497, 498, cert denied 540 US 1162 )." [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
" The Court noted: "Since the law favors the free and unobstructed use of real property, a restrictive covenant must be strictly construed against those seeking to enforce it, and may not be given an interpretation extending beyond the clear meaning of its terms (see Witter v Taggart, 78 NY2d 234, 237-238; Wechsler v Gasparrini, 40 AD3d 976; Liebowitz v Forman, 22 AD3d 530, 531; Kaufman v Fass, 302 AD2d 497, 498, cert denied 540 US 1162 ). [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:20 am
On May 31, 2022, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, issued an opinion in the case of Savage v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) Duran v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
By Thomas Kaufman In Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Tina Rad Employers breathed a sigh of relief when the California Supreme Court issued its December 29, 2011 ruling reversing the Court of Appeal's decision in Harris v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:10 am
Kaufman v Boies Schiller Flexner LLP2022 NY Slip Op 32743(U) August 15, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 154149/2018 Judge: James d’Auguste is the very fraught story of a massively fought matrimonial action. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:12 pm
Kaufman, et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) As anticipated, today the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Jason Guyser On January 28, 2013, Hon. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 6:46 am
However, in JCH Delta Contracting, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
By Thomas Kaufman and Robert Mussig On June 25, 2012, in Coito v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:50 am
By Thomas Kaufman As many readers of this blog know by now, last week the Supreme Court issued yet another anti-class certification decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:58 pm
A recent lawsuit entitled Kaufman v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:46 am
The courts are closed on this election day, but the law office is open and so we're posting a case.Housing matters.The First Department upheld the City agency's granting of a certificate of eviction on the ground that the apartment at issue was not petitioner-tenant's primary residence, in Kaufman v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:39 pm
By Thomas Kaufman On Friday afternoon, the Fourth Appellate District, Division 3 (Orange County) decided Faulkinbury v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 10:08 am
On March 11, 2021, the Nevada Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, held in Nautilus Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 9:49 am
These decisions were in line with last year’s Adolph v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 8:10 am
Pennsylvania Superior Court Recognizes Employees’ Right to Sue Employers Under the Medical Marijuana Act By Greg Hyman and Eileen Ficaro In a matter of first impression, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, in Scranton Quincy Clinic Company, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Lundgren v Kaufman Astoria Studios, 261 AD2d 513, the Appellate Division noted that "Generally, where a collective bargaining agreement containing a grievance and arbitration procedure ... a covered employee may not sue his or her employer directly for breach of the agreement, but must proceed through the union in accordance with the contract. [read post]
