Search for: "Matter of Kenneth V." Results 41 - 60 of 892
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 4:38 pm by Maria Hook
Lawrence Collins LJ (as he then was) described it as “a very serious matter for the English court to grant an injunction to restrain enforcement in a foreign country of a judgment of a court of that country” (Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd (No. 3) [2008] EWCA Civ 625, [2009] QB 503 at [93]). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v Wong, 2012 ONCA 432, indicated that this definition equally applies to s. 95 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
  In a continuation of their previous analysis of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But this is a matter of political tactics, not of fundamental political or constitutional theory. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But the defamation claims against DaBaby had been thrown out in September, in an opinion (Carey v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Federal theory in the twentieth century is first developed by institutionalist political scientists, such as Kenneth Wheare, who took the American federation as a lodestar.[8] Thus, the result of Texas v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am by Frank Cranmer
Kenneth Pinkerton and Rebekah Leviston: Charity Law Reform in Scotland: Part 2: Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Bill – a register of charity trustees – both “on” and “off the record”. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These factual contentions concerning whether defendant continued to represent plaintiff during the relevant time period so as to toll the limitations period give rise to factual issues that cannot be resolved in this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Boesky v Levine, 193 AD3d 403 [1st Dept 2021]; Johnson v Law Off. of Kenneth B. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am by Ashley Gorski
As a matter of U.S. government policy, people generally do not receive notice of this surveillance, even after the surveillance has ended and even where notice would not jeopardize an active investigation. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am by Anna Bower
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]