Search for: "Matter of Kent v Kent"
Results 41 - 60
of 750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 3:46 pm
That’s law Professor Kent Greenfield’s take in a new article for Democracy. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 10:34 pm
But what of the particular case at issue, Comer v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:59 am
Abstract: In a recent case, Virginia v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
The High Court decision in R (on the Application of Bowen) v Kent County Council [2023] EWHC 1261 (Admin) makes it clear that local authorities cannot exclude humanist representatives from their Standing Advisory Councils for Religious Education (SACREs). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:21 am
Lousiana (1975), and in Duren v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm
(Orin Kerr) Over at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has an interesting post on the Supreme Court’s recent qualified immunity decision, Reichle v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
In this issue:Editorial:Alastair Kent, "Patients and IP - Should we care? [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:50 pm
Kent wrote here about Virginia Gov. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:08 pm
As John Pottow previewed in this post, the Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in Stern v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
Robins was “technically . . . a victory for the company,” as a practical matter “it was a huge loss. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm
Here is the abstract: In a recent case, Virginia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:43 am
This year, the gathering of industry compliance and legal professionals heard the usual updates on CFTC enforcement actions and NFA regulatory matters, but also had the opportunity to learn about the intersection of antitrust and derivatives law, ethical issues implicated in regulatory investigations, and lessons on aggressive courtroom tactics from a lawyer who took on the DOJ in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
By Kent B. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
” Elsewhere at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the Court’s denial of a stay to a Florida death-row inmate; he suggests that, no matter what “the Court may decide on the merits in”Hurst v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:38 pm
City of Kent, 2008 Wash. [read post]
6 May 2015, 6:17 am
It certainly is controversial as a policy matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Bird https://t.co/4maw4HfaOs -> Shakespeare would thrive in a world with copyright. https://t.co/GhBNw0yeDC -> Thoughts on Gawker Legal Woes https://t.co/bvbXkAOyQ3 -> Communication to the public: is that the effect that finally matters? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:02 am
State v. [read post]
