Search for: "Matter of M. M. v A. A." Results 41 - 60 of 15,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The cases of Ambrose, G and M deal with various challenges that have arisen since the ruling in Cadder v HM Advocate. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 8:12 am
They had brought a claim against H&M in 2010 for infringement of the patent, and after some judicial give-and-take the matter was settled in late 2011. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:39 am by Daily Record Staff
They raise two issues on appeal: (1) whether the court had subject matter jurisdiction ... [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:30 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0304, 2010 MT 9N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:26 pm by Thomas James
The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Unicolor, but H&M moved for judgment as a matter of law (notwithstanding the jury verdict). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:34 am
I'm no expert on the machinations of the Supreme Court, but it seems to me that the judgment in Kernott v Jones will not now be handed down until the Michaelmas term, which begins on the third of October. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:08 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0642, 2011 MT 172N, CHRISTINA M. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 6:16 am
In Does Revlon Matter: An Empirical and Theoretical Study, we examine the effect the seminal case of Revlon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Francisco Macías
This month provided many historical moments, present and past, for  Méndez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:23 am by John Culhane
I’m using the word “matter” in two different senses, obviously. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm by scanner1
SHATTUCK, Individually and as Personal Representative for the ESTATE OF DANE M. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 pm by Andrea
Below is fellow Solosezzer, large plant printed shirt wearing, lives and works in the US Virgin Islands, fellow Andy (ok I’m Ande but it’s close enough) … in the matter Hall v. [read post]