Search for: "Matter of McCombs"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
’ [58] Paraphrasing from Diplock LJ’s judgment in Slim v Daily Telegraph [1968] 2 QB 157, McCombe LJ said it would be unfortunate ‘for free speech in this country if this kind of controversy on a matter of public though local interest were discouraged by the fear that every word written to be read in haste should be subjected in a court of law to minute linguistic analysis of the kind to which these [papers] have been subjected…’ Laws LJ agreed with… [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
Does it matter if you represent 1 out of 3 as 33%? [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 6:08 am
McComb, 331 U .S. 722, 730 (1947) (classifying as employees speciality group of production line workers in part because “[t]he group had no business organization that could or did shift as a unit from one slaughter-house to another”). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
He did not, however, accept the argument that the claim should be struck out because the institution is prevented from bringing a defamation action: “In this jurisdiction, if it were decided that as a matter of public policy universities should not have the right to sue for libel, that could only be implemented by the legislature or, perhaps, by the Supreme Court“. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
In fact, the Commission found, internal documents supplied by the newspaper “strongly indicated to the contrary“: “they recorded that the complainant had been present at meetings where the matter had been discussed, and that he had provided the committee with updates on both internal and external investigations. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:37 am
McCombe LJ, delivering the decision of the Court, rejected both these contentions. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:18 am
Precisely how much work she performed for Aegis, and for how many hours she should be compensated by Aegis, are matters for trial. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
McCombe J was of course bound by the House of Lords view of the matter. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 1:01 am
McComb, 332 U.S. 422, 432-35 (1947)). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
" McComb v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
McCombe J decided to allow the cross-examination to proceed so that he could resolve the issue of fact and he did – in the claimants’ favour. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
Joining them were Madonna’s then-husband, Guy Ritchie, and actors James Van Der Beek and Heather McComb. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm
It's only a matter of time. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 10:10 am
With clients on every continent but Antarctica, he has what it takes to solve your IRS problems no matter where you live in the world. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
A test of such strictness would be unrealistic and, as it seems to me, McCombe J came very close to applying it when he came to his conclusion in this case. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am
That is a matter that now remains within the scope of the Court of Appeal or possibly the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
Well, there's nothing wrong with that (as a matter of law at any rate, although it can raise its own issues as Ealing/Locata found). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
Well, there's nothing wrong with that (as a matter of law at any rate, although it can raise its own issues as Ealing/Locata found). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
Essays/Essais/EnsayosPaper n. 2, pp. 1 - 20 Cristina AmatoFinancial Contracts And ‘Junk Bonds’ Purchases in the Italian Legal System:A Matter of (In)Correct Disclosure Conference Proceedings/Rapports des conf? [read post]
