Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy"
Results 41 - 60
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
McCoy v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am
However, “[t]he continuous representation doctrine serves to toll the statute of limitations and render timely an otherwise time-barred cause of action for legal malpractice, but ‘only where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541, 543 [2018], quoting McCoy v Feinman,… [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 7:45 am
Case citation: Jeppson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:42 am
However, “[t]he continuous representation doctrine serves to toll the statute of limitations and render timely an otherwise time-barred cause of action for legal malpractice, but ‘only where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541, 543 [2018], quoting McCoy v Feinman,… [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:11 am
A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302 [2002]; Biberaj v Acocella, 120 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2014]). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:31 am
McCoy, 117 A.D.3d 806, 808, 985 N.Y.S.2d 629). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:40 am
. regardless of when the operative facts are discovered by the plaintiff” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164 [citations omitted]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d at 1086). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
(See McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002).) [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
(See McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002).) [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
In McCoy v San Francisco, City and County, 14 F.3d 28 , theU.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
In McCoy v San Francisco, City and County, 14 F.3d 28 , theU.S. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, “a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages ***” ( Island Properties & Equities, LLC v Cox, 93 AD3d 639, 640 [2d Dept 2012]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295… [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
The “continuous representation doctrine tolls the statute of limitations … where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” (Zorn v Gilbert, 8 NY3d 933, 934 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]; see also Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 167-168 [2001J). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm
Details will matter as will implementation. [read post]
