Search for: "Matter of Melendez" Results 41 - 60 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by Richard D. Friedman
But Justice Ginsburg treats the matter delicately, presumably because formality was (unfortunately) essential for Justice Thomas’s vote. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Virginia, which was to further explore the ramifications of the Court’s decision at the end of the 2008 term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court sat on the case without action, until four days after deciding Melendez-Diaz, then granted review instead of sending it back to Virginia courts to apply Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
 Melendez-Diaz v.Massachusetts made clear that the defendant’s right to subpoena a witness does not satisfy the confrontation right.) [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 11:36 am by Richard D. Friedman
But to the extent that the Supreme Court, in considering the matter in Melendez-Diaz, may hesitate to characterize such reports as testimonial for fear of imposing gratuitous costs on the criminal justice system, these recent developments highlight the dangers of allowing lab analysts to create evidence for prosecution without being subjected to cross-examination. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:59 pm by Richard D. Friedman
This is likely to be a very significant follow-up to Melendez-Diaz, posing the issue of whether forensic lab results may be introduced through a surrogate witness. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:07 am by Aaron Tang
  As a general matter, do you think the use of timely cases in the classroom is helpful? [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:19 pm by Daniel D. Blinka
In an important gloss on its 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
New Mexico, the Court narrowly repulsed an attack on Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
  The state had argued that the Cellmark results weren’t being offered for the truth of the matter, but simply as a basis for the expert’s opinion. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:40 pm
The People contended that there was an open door policy to question the defendant on evidence given during direct examination according to the People v Melendez 55 N.Y.2d 445. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Melendez, 55 NY2d 445, the Court of Appeals addressed the issue of opened doors in a murder case. [read post]