Search for: "Matter of Q. M. v B. C." Results 41 - 60 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If you impose notice and takedown, I have to take it down b/c I’m in no position to judge. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[I’m not optimistic.] [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Law is a particularly powerful voice in this discourse b/c it speaks w/the power of the state. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dorling Kindersley/I think you will be forced to determine the original author’s purpose as a matter of law v. matter of fact, like contracts.A: He thinks he’s reducing uncertainty but also that DK is the kind of case that should always have to go to a jury [which doesn’t sound uncertainty reducing to me].Q: 2d Cir treated Sony as a transformative use case: was that right? [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel One: User-generated Content, Digital Labor, and Collaborative AuthorshipModerator: Bethany RabeRebecca Tushnet: Fanworks, Fair Use, and Self-Actualization Through Transformative ExpressionTitle assigned a few months ago is a little misleading because I actually wanted to take the opportunity to talk about the Copyright Office’s recent report on moral rights, though I’m happy to talk about anything fanwork related during the panel discussion and Q&A. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  B/c the contribution to the joint tort car accident is a one-off, it may not transfer well. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]