Search for: "Matter of R S III"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2008, 6:31 am
New York's Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) allows the agency which is subject to a FOIL request to charge $0.25 per photocopy for copies made to comply with a FOIL request (see Public Officers Law § 87 [1][b][iii]). [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:56 pm
Guest Post by Robert R. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:45 am
By George R. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
It is undisputed that in the present case the applicant has made use of this opportunity in the examination proceedings (R 86(3) EPC 1973 and R 137(2), respectively) and finally has decided to request the grant of a patent covering the combination of features M3+M4. [4.2] Even during the examination proceedings, further amendments of the application can only be made with the consent of the ED (R 86(3) EPC 1973 and R 137(3), respectively). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:20 am
Carbajal III is prosecuting the case. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:20 am
Carbajal III is prosecuting the case. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
It is evident that the applicant was referring to the 2010 version of the Guidelines, but the 2007 version makes the same statement at C-III, 5.2 (ii) with reference to R 137(4) pre April 2010. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
In Matter of F-P-R- , 24 I&N Dec. 681 (BIA 2008) , for example, the BIA declined to follow the Second Circuit’s decision in Joaquin-Porras v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:02 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:38 pm
,Matter of Gregory S., Matter of Michelle L., Matter of Ayana Jean L., Matter of Aminat O. and Matter of Sade W. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 10:48 am
We took in the current Ashland offering of Shakespeare's Richard III last night. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Third, as WilmerHale's Craig Goldblatt (who was on the merits brief for Pierce's estate) noted to me, the Court's opinion at pages 33-34 makes pretty clear that Section 157(b)(2)(H)? [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:00 pm
Here’s the question presented (obviously, the petitioner’s statement of the matter): Whether Congress may confer Article III standing upon a plaintiff who suffers no concrete harm, and who therefore could not otherwise invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court, by authorizing a private right of action based on a bare violation of a federal statute. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:55 pm
The EPO’s own figures in the Quality Report 2016 seem to suggest that its Directorate Quality Audit (DQA) is happy with about 85% of the intentions to grant (R 71(3) Communications), whereas the number of search reports found “compliant” by quality audits is in the order of as much as 95%. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:56 am
District Judge Charles R. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the matter with instructions. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:14 am
And, fascinatingly, there's no enforcement mechanism. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Thorsten BauschEarly certainty in opposition proceedings is clearly a desirable objective, and the President’s commitment to lowering the average duration of (normal) opposition proceedings to 15 months on the average deserves praise. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
This is part III of our series on how to sue a Chinese company. [read post]
