Search for: "Matter of Ragland"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2008, 3:05 pm
A new pro-consumer “UM stacking” law has been passed which, beginning January 1, 2009, will allow car and truck accident victims in Georgia to maximize the benefit of any uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage contained within their own auto policy and/or any auto policy applicable to the motor vehicle in which they were traveling if it is not their own vehicle. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:02 pm
Ragland, Diana L. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
Ragland, Diana L. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:18 pm
Ragland, Diana L. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland: Ali v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:24 pm
Farm Dust (Winter): "The EPA is expected to issue revised standards for particulate matter (PM) in the near future. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:11 am
It does not matter that this sign could technically be displayed in a different location, such as a Hindu temple. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
. * * *Summary of Argument The speech restriction in this case, which distinguishes (1) signs “support[ing] candidates” or relating to “any other matter on the ballot,” (2) “sign[s] communicating a message or ideas,” and (3) signs related to noncommercial “event[s],” is facially content-based. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Labels matter. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
Ragland, a publisher challenged a state tax that provided for exemptions for "religious, professional, trade and sports journals" but not for that publisher's own product, a general-interest magazine. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
The Petition Should Be Granted Because the Decision Below Creates Conflict and Confusion in the Lower Courts Are sign ordinances that allow some signs based on subject matter, while restricting others, content-based? [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
As I’ve mentioned here previously, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
