Search for: "Matter of SL"
Results 41 - 60
of 399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
In addition to Engstrom, the SLS contributors to the book are: Nora Freeman Engstrom, the Ernest W. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
As Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote: “The Court today holds that Indian country within a State’s territory is part of a State, not separate from a State,” reasoning that “as a matter of state sovereignty, a State has jurisdiction over all of its territory, including Indian country. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm
SLS Professor Robert WeisbergCongressional hearings into the January 6, 2021 storming of the U.S. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
Earlier that year Mostyn had given another judgment on the same topic in DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam), where he had said ‘there are some categories of court business, which are so personal and private that in almost every case where anonymisation is sought the right to privacy will trump the right to unfettered freedom of expression’. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 pm
Under the direction of the General Counsel, the Assistant General Counsel provides legal services and representation to the Tribe, its agencies, and its enterprises in a broad variety of matters, including contract law, employment law, administrative law, real estate matters, Indian gaming regulation, taxation, tribal jurisdiction, environmental [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
For this week’s Guest Post Friday here at Construction Law Musings, we would like to welcome back (again) Sean Lintow Sr. of SLS Construction & Building Solutions. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:57 am
SLS students have been unusual among the top schools for their willingness to speak out. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:28 pm
Similarly, within one legal system the development of a particular subject matter is often undertaken as a result of borrowings or copying from another subject matter within the same legal system. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 4:22 am
Charleston, SC Irexa Financial Services Wealth StrategiesAccording to Irexa Financial’s website, the following is a list of current offerings: Irexa TSWR Development SWD Portfolio I, DST – Texas Irexa SL-FL NNN Industrial Portfolio I, DST – Florida Irexa CSRA Grocery Portfolio II, DST – North Carolina 1031 Exchange Properties According to 1031 Gateway, the following is a list of current offerings: Coeur d’Alene ARC CVS Portfolio Coeur d’Alene… [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 1:50 am
But counsel for defendants will leave no stone unturned, no matter the prospects of prevailing on such a defense to an injunction request. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 11:48 am
That is one of the most provocative questions that has arisen in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, and one that has divided scholars and politicians alike. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 8:42 am
The statement of facts details how SGL caused the reporting of false costs to the MoJ by SL, intending to ensure that the MoJ did not, on seeing high profit margins, attempt to limit any of SL’s future profits, recover any of SL’s previous profits, seek more favourable terms during renegotiations of contracts, or otherwise threaten the revenue stream SL obtained as a result of the continuing operation of the contract. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
SLS Landscaping, 463 N.J. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v… [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am
; and 2) what is the test to be applied by an appellate court to an assessment of the decision of the trial court in respect of a statutory defence of ‘lawful excuse’ when Convention rights are engaged in a criminal matter? [read post]
