Search for: "Matter of Shell Oil Co."
Results 41 - 60
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm
In 2014, for instance, a DOL investigation resulted in Shell Oil Co. and Motiva Enterprises LLC, which markets Shell gasoline and other products, agreeing to pay $4,470,764 in overtime back wages to 2,677 current and former chemical and refinery employees to settle DOL charges that the companies violated FLSA overtime provisions by not paying workers for the time spent at mandatory pre-shift meetings and failing to record the time spent at these meetings. [read post]
25 May 2017, 10:43 am
Shell Oil Co., 466 U.S. 54, 68-69 (1984), the Ninth Circuit opined that the relevance standard encompasses “virtually any material that might cast light on the allegations against the employer. [read post]
18 May 2017, 10:01 pm
Tips from the Florida health department are effective no matter where shellfish are harvested and eaten. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
At MaumeeBayState Park in Oregon (Lucas Co.), Gov. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:45 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:05 am
Shell Oil Co., 2007 WL 2220986 (S.D.Tex. 2007), the court granted a request for summary judgment since the spar, the URSA was not vessel. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010), which addressing a similar issue upon a case removed to the federal court under CAFA, held that post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010), which addressing a similar issue upon a case removed to the federal court under CAFA, held that post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Shell Oil Company (1970) 2 Cal.3d 245, 248); wholesalers and distributors (Barth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:26 am
Citing Rebel Oil Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
Shell Oil Co., In re Kosmos Energy offers a clear takeaway: in 2014, class certification requires an actual evidentiary showing. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2010), held that if a defendant properly removed a putative class action at the get-go, a district court’s subsequent denial of class certification does not divest the court of jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
Shell Oil Co., and drew a lengthy dissent from Judge Newman. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:53 pm
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1089 (9th Cir.2010), the Ninth Circuit joining with the Seventh Circuit, concluded that “if the putative class action was properly removed to begin with, the subsequent denial of Rule 23 class certification does not divest the district court of jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 3:49 am
The case against BNP before the French courts is a reminiscent of the case against Shell before the Dutch courts in 2019 where the environmental group (Milieudefensie) and co-plaintiffs argued that Shell’s business operations and sold energy products worldwide contributes significantly to climate change (and also much more than it has pledges to in its corporate policies and to the levels internationally determined by conventions) was a violation of its duty of care… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1089 (9th Cir. 2010), the Ninth Circuit held that when a district court has subject matter jurisdiction under CAFA, subsequent denial of class certification does not divest district court jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:56 am
Cites as an example Shell Oil, which has brought much legal work in-house. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
We consider whether federal courts possess exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction over state-based legal malpractice claims that require the application of federal patent law. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091–92 (9th Cir.2010), also recognized this reasoning, stating that it is likely that “Congress intended that the usual and long-standing principles apply ... post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:47 pm
Shell Oil Co., No. 07-2308 (8th Cir. [read post]
